Federal Court Dismisses Class Actions for COVID Business Interruption Claims
Federal Court Dismisses Class Actions for COVID Business Interruption Claims
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
The Federal Court has determined that business interruption claims related to COVID-19, involving four insurers, should not proceed as class actions.
This ruling obliges individual policyholders to pursue their cases separately if they wish to proceed.
Justice Michael Lee announced on Friday that proceedings are adjourned pending the issuance of "declassing orders," following arguments from insurers against group actions. Policyholders who had hoped to be part of the class actions will receive notices explaining their rights and options for individual claims.
The legal firms involved, including Gordon Legal and Slater & Gordon, had initiated cases against multiple insurers. Specifically, Gordon Legal filed on behalf of Cody Gemtec Retail t/as the National Opal Collection against Syndicate 2003 at Lloyd’s, and Strand Fitness and others against QBE. Slater & Gordon filed cases for CMC Hospitality against Insurance Australia, and Vicki Field Swim School against Hollard.
An IAG spokesperson welcomed the decision, urging customers with potential COVID-19-related business interruption claims to file those claims individually to facilitate efficient assessment through their standard process. The company also highlighted that a further case management hearing is anticipated and the appeal period remains active, promising updates "at the appropriate time."
James Naughton, a partner at Gordon Legal, told insuranceNEWS.com.au that individuals are encouraged to contact the firm to discuss their options for submitting individual claims against their insurers.
The court had previously ordered that policyholders be notified to register their interest in the proposed class actions, which garnered thousands of responses by a set deadline earlier this year.
Cody Gemtec Retail t/as the National Opal Collection vs. Syndicate 2003 at Lloyd's
Strand Fitness vs. QBE
CMC Hospitality vs. Insurance Australia
Vicki Field Swim School vs. Hollard
John Berrill, the principal of Berrill and Watson Lawyers, clarified that Friday's ruling addresses only the procedural aspect of how claims should be resolved—individual vs. class actions—without commenting on the validity of the claims. He emphasized the importance of policyholders understanding their rights and considering their options promptly since claims linked to the 2020 pandemic lockdowns are approaching the six-year statute of limitations for legal action.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Federal moves to restrict the use of genetic test results in life insurance underwriting have important implications for Australians who are thinking about income protection cover. The reform is designed to reduce the fear that taking a medically useful genetic test could later make it harder, more expensive or impossible to obtain personal insurance. - read more
Recent income protection cost commentary has put a practical issue back in front of Australian workers: two policies that appear similar at first glance can carry very different long-term costs. For people relying on their income to meet mortgage repayments, rent, school fees, business expenses or family commitments, the premium is important, but it should not be viewed in isolation. - read more
Recent regulatory attention on life insurance claims handling has again highlighted a practical issue for Australians who rely on income protection insurance: the value of cover is tested most clearly when a person is too unwell or injured to keep earning. While the industry has been working to improve service standards, the latest scrutiny reinforces that delays, unclear requests for information and poor communication can make an already stressful period harder for claimants. - read more
APRA’s latest life insurance performance data has again highlighted why income protection remains one of the most closely watched parts of the Australian insurance market. While the broader life insurance sector has continued to show signs of improved stability, disability income products remain sensitive to claims trends, pricing assumptions and the length of time people stay off work after illness or injury. - read more
The latest industry attention on Life Insurance Code compliance is another reminder that income protection insurance is not just about having a policy in place. For working Australians, the real test comes when illness or injury interrupts earnings and a claim needs to move from paperwork to practical financial support. - read more
Recent industry attention on insurance claims handling has put a practical issue back in front of Australian households: a policy is only as valuable as the support it provides when a claim is made. For income protection insurance, that moment often arrives during illness, injury, stress and reduced cash flow, so clear communication and timely assessment matter enormously. - read more
Income protection insurance can be held through superannuation or personally outside super. The right structure depends on funding, tax, policy features, claim access, portability and your personal circumstances. - read more
Income protection is a crucial safety net for Australians, offering financial security when health setbacks strike. This type of insurance ensures that you continue to receive a portion of your income if illness or injury prevents you from working. It’s an essential aspect of financial planning, providing peace of mind knowing that you can maintain your lifestyle even when unforeseen health issues arise. - read more
Income protection insurance can provide regular payments if illness or injury prevents you from working. In Australia, it also has important tax implications: eligible premiums may generally be claimed as a tax deduction, while benefits paid under the policy are usually treated as assessable income. - read more
Income protection insurance is often surrounded by the myth of being unaffordable, deterring many Australians from safeguarding their most valuable asset—their ability to earn. This introduction aims to address this misconception head on, revealing the real value that income insurance policies can provide. It is crucial to understand that the cost of such a policy pales in comparison to the potential financial hardship faced without one. - read more
Freelancing can offer flexibility and independence, but it can also mean taking responsibility for your own financial safety net. For Australian freelancers, income protection or disability insurance may help replace part of your income if illness or injury prevents you from working. - read more
In the realm of personal finance, security is a cornerstone that cannot be overlooked, and this is where income protection insurance steps in. For Australians, the peace of mind that comes with knowing you're covered against loss of income due to illness or injury is invaluable. This form of coverage acts as a financial safety net, ensuring that life's unexpected twists do not leave you in a lurch. - read more
Start Here !
Apply now for your free Insurance assessment and price comparisons!
All quotes are provided free and without obligation. We respect your privacy.
Knowledgebase
Flood Insurance: A specific type of property insurance that covers losses and damage caused by flooding.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.