Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Insurers Propel Forward in Global Sustainability Rankings 10 Oct 2024: Paige Estritori In a remarkable evolution within the finance sector, insurance companies demonstrate a growing commitment to sustainability, outperforming many global industries, according to Capgemini's latest analysis. - read more

Innovative Fee Protection for Schools: A New Safety Net 08 Oct 2024: Paige Estritori 360 Underwriting Solutions has marked a significant stride in financial resilience for educational institutions by launching a novel insurance product designed specifically for independent schools. This new solution addresses a critical gap by safeguarding schools from potential financial disruptions caused by unpaid fees. - read more

Stolen Bag Saga: Travel Insurance Dispute Highlights Policy Loopholes 07 Oct 2024: Paige Estritori A recent travel mishap has brought attention to travel insurance policy nuances, as a traveler successfully claimed $6,300 after his bag was taken by a tuk-tuk driver during an overseas trip. - read more

Calls for Transparency Surge as Disclosure Debate Continues 04 Oct 2024: Paige Estritori In the evolving landscape of insurance broking, the push for greater transparency surrounding broker remuneration has gained renewed momentum. Amidst ongoing assessments of the Insurance Brokers Code, the Code Compliance Committee has vocally advocated for a reinstatement of mandatory remuneration disclosures to small business clients, with a strategic focus on refreshing trust through clarity. - read more

icare Ushers in Major Changes Starting Next Week 01 Oct 2024: Paige Estritori Commencing on October 8, icare is gearing up for significant structural changes aimed at streamlining operations and boosting efficiency. This initiative comes in response to a comprehensive Operational Expenditure Review conducted by NSW Treasury, which outlines 14 pivotal findings to help reduce the state's insurer's service costs by 5%. - read more

Horse Accident Claim Rejected: A Deeper Look into Trauma Insurance 01 Oct 2024: Paige Estritori An individual who sustained serious injuries from a horse riding accident has been denied a trauma insurance payout, as authorities concluded that there is insufficient proof that her condition is irreversible. - read more