Insurers Urged to Ensure Fairness Before Stopping Payouts

1

The focal point of the dispute centered on TAL's decision to stop payments without prior notification. The AFCA found this action unjust, supporting the claimant's assertion that payments should have continued until she resumed work in August. In response, AFCA ordered TAL to compensate the claimant, covering benefits up to July 28, adjusting the payout based on profit and loss statements, and providing interest for unpaid and underpaid amounts.

TAL initially rejected these claims, citing policy conditions that required adherence to medical treatment recommended by the claimant's doctors, which the claimant had allegedly not followed. Although the policy specified the need for ongoing medical care and compliance with recommendations, the claimant had opted for a conservative treatment approach, diverging from suggested cortisone injections and a surgical opinion.

In its findings, AFCA acknowledged that the absence of the claimant from work from February last year was not unequivocally justified but emphasised that the insurer should have communicated concerns promptly. This lack of timely communication potentially hindered the insurer’s ability to cut off payments earlier under appropriate procedural notice.

This ruling serves as a critical reminder to insurers about the necessity of procedural diligence when making decisions that impact policyholders' financial well-being. It underscores the duty of fair and timely notice, essential for maintaining trust and transparency in insurance dealings. For consumers, it highlights the importance of understanding policy requirements and maintaining open communication with insurers.

The AFCA’s decision is poised to influence how insurers manage benefit reassessment and termination processes. The case highlights the need for insurers to tighten their procedural practices to prevent similar disputes. Moving forward, insurers may implement more robust communication protocols and procedural fairness checks to ensure compliance with AFCA’s guidelines. This could also lead to broader industry reviews on income protection policies and claims management, fostering greater accountability.

Published:Tuesday, 22nd Jul 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AFCA Sides with Insurer in Pet Injury Dispute 31 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has upheld PetSure's decision to cap their payout at $2,600 for a dog's medical costs, settling a dispute over pet insurance claims. The dog's accidental injury involved a ruptured cranial cruciate ligament, requiring approximately $6,500 in veterinary care, including surgery. Although the owners' claim was initially accepted, it was limited under the policy's annual sublimit for cruciate ligament conditions. - read more

Reviving Australia's Troubled Insurance Industry: Opportunities and Challenges 30 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori Australia's retail life insurance sector is facing significant challenges despite generating approximately $9.4 billion in annual premiums. Upon closer examination, it's evident that this industry is under strain. Growth is primarily driven by price increases rather than the addition of new clients, signalling concerns for long-term sustainability. New business growth hovers around 8-9% annually, not enough to adequately bolster the sector. - read more

NSW Government Warns of Financial Impact from Stall in Workers' Compensation Reform 29 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The New South Wales government has issued a stark warning regarding potential financial consequences if proposed reforms to workplace mental injury laws are delayed further. As an upper house committee gathers to discuss these changes, Treasurer Daniel Mookhey highlights the urgency, stating that setbacks will result in increased premiums. - read more

AFCA Rejects Traveller's Insurer Claim for Alternative Flight Costs 25 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori An Australian travel insurance policyholder faced disappointment as the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) denied their claim for reimbursement of costs incurred due to changing travel plans amid threats of a pilot strike. The traveller, who rearranged his flights from Sydney to Vancouver and subsequently to Toronto, had hoped his insurer, AIG Australia, would cover the $5,576 expenses for the rebooked flights and additional accommodation. - read more

Fee Models Emerge as Solution to Cyclone Insurance Affordability Concerns 25 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The affordability of cyclone insurance in Australia’s high-risk zones remains a pressing issue, prompting some brokers to shift towards fee-based models. This change is highlighted in the latest annual review of the cyclone reinsurance pool from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). - read more

Homeowner's Storm Damage Claim Denied; Faulty Construction Cited 24 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori A homeowner's attempt to secure a storm damage insurance payout has been thwarted after an investigation revealed that the damage was due to poor maintenance and faulty construction, rather than extreme weather conditions. The initial claim attributed the damage on the property's western wall and roof eaves to significant rainfall, citing a substantial 141mm in July, with a notable record of 43.6mm in a single day. - read more