Insurer Ordered to Cover Restaurant Arson Despite Director's Unrevealed Criminal Record

0

The restaurant's sole director contended the omission was unintentional and emphasised his efforts toward rehabilitation. He proposed to pay any additional premiums necessitated by his past, seeking a fair resolution to his claim. However, QBE maintained that knowledge of his convictions would have impacted their decision to provide coverage from the outset.

AFCA examined the claim documentation, highlighting that QBE had not substantiated its stance. It noted the absence of conclusive evidence of what specific inquiries were made during the policy's initiation, given the broker used an electronic interface linked to QBE's systems. Critically, QBE failed to furnish definitive proof of the questions asked, nor did it provide screenshots of the policy initiation process.

The crux of AFCA's decision rested on the ambiguity of the questions. One inquiry appeared specific to the company's criminal history, rather than its director. Though QBE suggested a duty for directors to disclose past convictions, AFCA's ombudsman determined the insurer did not demonstrate an adequate breach of disclosure obligations by the insured company.

As a result, AFCA concluded that QBE could not justifiably void the policy or deny the claim. The insurer is mandated to reinstate coverage and conduct any additional evaluations required to settle the claim under the policy's terms, all within 28 days of the complainant's acknowledgment of this determination.

This decision underscores the complexities surrounding disclosure obligations in insurance contracts and the critical need for insurers to clearly document and validate their inquiries during the underwriting process.

Published:Thursday, 12th Jun 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AFCA Upholds Insurance Fraud Ruling Over Disputed Possum Accident 26 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A motorist's claim that he crashed into a tree to avoid a possum has been denied by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), which supported the insurer's fraud decision. The incident involved the driver crashing his Jeep—insured for over $20,000—on a dimly-lit street, purportedly avoiding the rain-soaked motorway en route to the store. - read more

Code Watchdog Criticises Insurer for Misleading Rejection Letters 24 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori The Life Code Compliance Committee has recently reprimanded a life insurance provider for issuing misleading rejection letters to policy applicants. These letters were deemed 'ambiguous and contradictory' and failed to clearly inform applicants of their review options after being denied coverage. - read more

Insurer Ordered to Pay Full Claim for Confusing Patio Coverage 23 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A recent ruling mandates that an insurer must fully honor a storm-related claim due to ambiguous policy wording regarding items in open areas. The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) determined that the insurer's restriction on coverage for items in a patio area was unfounded, as the policy's phrasing was not clear. - read more

Australia Sees Dramatic Drop in Catastrophe Losses 23 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori Last year saw Australia's insured catastrophe losses plummet to just $500 million, marking the lowest level since 2004, according to Aon's latest Climate and Catastrophe Insight report. Notably, the Insurance Council of Australia reported no disasters for the year, a situation not seen since 1982. This comes in stark contrast to 2023, when disaster-related insured losses soared to over $3.6 billion. - read more

Half a Million Australian Homes at Risk of Becoming Uninsurable, Climate Agency Reports 21 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori The Climate Change Authority has released a concerning report highlighting that, without immediate intervention, extreme natural hazards could cost Australians approximately $8.7 billion annually by 2050. The report urges the federal government to spearhead a comprehensive and well-coordinated national adaptation agenda to mitigate these risks. - read more

Red Sea Unrest: Insurer Denies Cruise Cancellation Claim 20 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori An Australian travel policyholder has been denied a claim payout after his planned cruise in the Red Sea was cancelled due to conflict. The insurer, Southern Cross, invoked its policy's war and violence exclusion clause, as disturbances in the region were linked to military activities, rendering the claim invalid. - read more