Hacked Company Loses Insurance Battle Over Customer Payment Scam

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The company, holding a management liability insurance policy, sought to claim under its third-party crime coverage to recover the outstanding bills from the customers. However, AIG Australia denied the claim, stating that the policy only addressed "direct financial loss" from theft or fraud by a third party, and argued that since the stolen money belonged to customers, the business itself did not suffer a direct loss.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) reviewed the case and acknowledged the company's loss. However, it determined that the loss did not align with the policy's specific terms. The ruling emphasized that only the company's customers faced direct financial loss, whereas the company experienced an indirect one due to subsequent non-payments.

The AFCA explained that the hack did not meet the company's policy definition of theft, as the stolen funds belonged to the customers, not the business. This discrepancy meant that the policy's electronic and computer crime coverage was not applicable. Additionally, the policy's criteria for "fraudulent act," which required acts of forgery or counterfeiting the insured had acted upon, were not met since the company was unaware of the false invoices.

This case highlights the critical distinction between direct and indirect financial losses in insurance claims, emphasizing the importance of understanding policy terms. For businesses, particularly those prone to cyber threats, it underscores the significance of having insurance coverage that appropriately addresses loss scenarios stemming from such events. It also serves as a cautionary tale of the complexities involved in recovering from cybercrime attacks without adequate protection.

Moving forward, businesses should ensure robust cybersecurity measures to prevent similar email hacks, coupled with clarifying insurance policies for adequate coverage against indirect financial losses as a result of customer fraud. This scenario may lead insurance providers to reevaluate their product offerings, potentially driving the development of more comprehensive cybercrime coverages. Additionally, the financial sector might witness increased discussions on how to formulate clearer policy definitions that align with the evolving nature of cyber threats.

Published:Tuesday, 11th Mar 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Zurich Australia's New Income Protection for Women's Health

09 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Zurich Australia has unveiled a pioneering income protection benefit tailored specifically for women's health conditions, including menopause and endometriosis. This initiative addresses the significant impact these conditions have on women's professional lives and financial stability. - read more

APRA's Renewed Efforts to Reform Income Protection Insurance

09 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has announced the resumption of its reforms targeting individual disability income insurance (IDII), commonly known as income protection insurance. This initiative aims to address the financial challenges that have plagued the industry, with insurers reporting losses exceeding $3.4 billion over the past five years. - read more

AFCA's Landmark Decision on Occupation Definitions in Income Protection Claims

09 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently delivered a pivotal ruling that clarifies the definition of 'occupation' within the context of income protection insurance claims. This decision arose from a dispute involving a policyholder whose income protection benefits were terminated after the insurer discovered he was listed as a director of a company while receiving payments. - read more

AustralianSuper Announces Reduction in Default Income Protection Cover

01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

AustralianSuper, one of Australia's largest superannuation funds, has announced a significant change to its default income protection insurance. Effective from 28 February 2026, the fund will reduce the default income protection cover to $1,000 per month. This adjustment aims to align insurance coverage with members' actual income levels and prevent over-insurance, which can erode retirement savings. - read more

AIA Australia Introduces Enhancements to Priority Protection Insurance

01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

AIA Australia has recently updated its Priority Protection life insurance suite, introducing changes designed to simplify discounts, enhance policy clarity, and support premium affordability. These enhancements, effective from 9 November 2025, reflect AIA's commitment to providing value-driven solutions for policyholders. - read more

Rising Insurance Costs Impact Australian Retirees' Financial Stability

01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent reports have highlighted a concerning trend affecting Australian retirees: the escalating cost of insurance premiums is placing significant financial strain on individuals living on fixed incomes. Over the past five years, the average cost of home insurance in Australia has increased by 51%, according to analytics firm Finity. This surge in premiums is particularly burdensome for retirees who rely on limited superannuation funds and pensions to cover their living expenses. - read more

Click for more Insurance News