Autonomous Cars: Navigating the New Claims Terrain

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

Howden Re’s "Shaping the Future of Risk" report highlights that the surge in autonomous vehicle (AV) adoption is likely to lead to more intricate litigation scenarios. The expected litigation will ensnare vehicle manufacturers, software developers, hardware suppliers, and mapping service providers in various legal battles.

The report underscores that the growing prevalence of AVs might influence losses within motor liability insurance segments. AV technology could shift liability from individuals operating vehicles to the technology powering these autonomous systems, necessitating a shift towards product liability insurance over traditional motor insurance.

“Identifying the faulty component in a vehicle involved in an incident will be a challenging task,” Howden Re states. “Court outcomes in these cases could significantly sway motor liability insurance strategies. Depending on verdicts, this arena might demand stronger reserving strategies to accommodate potential claim variances.”

Motor liability currently constitutes as much as 40% of global property and casualty premiums, and projections suggest that by 2030, around 50% of new vehicles will be electric. Additionally, most new vehicles are expected to possess considerable technological connectivity, with some touting self-driving capabilities.

As AI-driven systems aim to replace human drivers in an effort to reduce accidents caused by human oversight, this will introduce a tentative period where both human-driven and autonomous vehicles coexist. This coexistence will inevitably complicate accident causality assessments and claims filing procedures.

“The artificial intelligence governing AVs operates on assumptions that might occasionally be flawed. Therefore, AVs complicate the accident and claims landscape by introducing new challenges in assigning fault,” Howden Re elaborates. “In mixed environments where human-driven and autonomous vehicles share the road, discerning whether a crash results from technological failure or human error becomes intricate.”

Both passengers in AVs and drivers of other involved vehicles might seek compensation from AV manufacturers in the event of an accident, potentially heightening overall claim costs.

Published:Tuesday, 10th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

What Genetic Testing Reform Could Mean for Income Protection

16 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Federal moves to restrict the use of genetic test results in life insurance underwriting have important implications for Australians who are thinking about income protection cover. The reform is designed to reduce the fear that taking a medically useful genetic test could later make it harder, more expensive or impossible to obtain personal insurance. - read more

Why Premium Differences Matter When Choosing Income Protection

09 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent income protection cost commentary has put a practical issue back in front of Australian workers: two policies that appear similar at first glance can carry very different long-term costs. For people relying on their income to meet mortgage repayments, rent, school fees, business expenses or family commitments, the premium is important, but it should not be viewed in isolation. - read more

ASIC Claims Scrutiny Highlights What Income Protection Customers Should Check

02 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent regulatory attention on life insurance claims handling has again highlighted a practical issue for Australians who rely on income protection insurance: the value of cover is tested most clearly when a person is too unwell or injured to keep earning. While the industry has been working to improve service standards, the latest scrutiny reinforces that delays, unclear requests for information and poor communication can make an already stressful period harder for claimants. - read more

Latest APRA Figures Keep Income Protection Under the Spotlight

26 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

APRA’s latest life insurance performance data has again highlighted why income protection remains one of the most closely watched parts of the Australian insurance market. While the broader life insurance sector has continued to show signs of improved stability, disability income products remain sensitive to claims trends, pricing assumptions and the length of time people stay off work after illness or injury. - read more

Life Code Findings Put Income Protection Claims Back Under the Microscope

12 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

The latest industry attention on Life Insurance Code compliance is another reminder that income protection insurance is not just about having a policy in place. For working Australians, the real test comes when illness or injury interrupts earnings and a claim needs to move from paperwork to practical financial support. - read more

Claims Handling Scrutiny Offers Income Protection Lessons

05 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent industry attention on insurance claims handling has put a practical issue back in front of Australian households: a policy is only as valuable as the support it provides when a claim is made. For income protection insurance, that moment often arrives during illness, injury, stress and reduced cash flow, so clear communication and timely assessment matter enormously. - read more

Click for more Insurance News